Why Does Your Kindness Need an Audience?
Part of the series Ancient Wisdom for Living Well
15 min read
Staying steady is hard when so much of life asks to be seen and liked. An old Chinese commentary offers a calmer way to be good.
Wang Bi’s commentary on Daodejing 38 explains why real virtue lasts longer, and helps more, when it stops advertising itself.
On 12 April 1955, Jonas Salk's polio vaccine was announced as safe and effective, and he became internationally famous. Soon afterwards, the journalist Edward R. Murrow asked him who owned the patent. Salk replied, "Well, the people, I would say. There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?"
The vaccine was never patented, and Salk took no personal royalties from it. Its development had been backed by the March of Dimes, university research and the work of many others.
That story doesn't prove a person has no pride. It does show someone treating a good result as something to hand over, not something to hold up.
It also raises a question that's older than vaccines: how do you stay grounded without becoming preoccupied with showing how good you are? Wang Bi (王弼), a third-century commentator on the Daodejing (道德經, Classic of the Way and Its Virtue), gives one of the most careful answers in Chinese philosophy.
Who Wrote What, and Why It Matters
The Daodejing is a short Chinese text traditionally credited to Laozi (老子, "Old Master"). Who wrote it, and how it took shape, are still debated. Manuscripts found at Guodian and Mawangdui show that it circulated in different forms before the Han dynasty.
Wang Bi lived from 226 to 249 CE and died at 23. His commentary on the Daodejing became the basis of the standard received text, and it reads the book in a strongly metaphysical way.
Chapter 38 opens the Dejing (德經, Classic of Virtue), the second half of the book. It sets natural, spontaneous goodness against self-conscious morality, ritual and staged behaviour.
上德不德，是以有德。
"The highest virtue (de, 德) makes no display of itself as virtue; therefore it possesses virtue." (Daodejing 38, with Wang Bi's commentary)
Picture this: a colleague mentions their charity work in every meeting. Chapter 38 asks a simple question about that kind of goodness. Is it still doing its job, or has it become a badge?
Virtue Is What You Receive
Wang Bi starts his comment with a pun.
德者，得也,
"virtue (de, 德) is what is attained (de, 得)."
The two words sound the same, and he uses that to make a point.
Virtue isn’t a trophy you buy and put on a shelf. For Wang Bi, de (德, virtue) is what a being receives from Dao (道, Way), the underlying source and generative order of things. It’s the particular power through which that source shows up in a person.
Think of a river as Dao. A field’s ability to feed crops is its de. The field doesn’t manufacture that ability by announcing it. It receives the river’s life-giving order and passes it on.
This is why de (德, virtue) is wider than a list of nice qualities. It covers integrity, inner strength and the ability to act without damaging the nature of things. Good intentions alone don't qualify.
In real life, this is an emergency doctor who stays calm. The calm isn't staged for admiration. It comes from preparation and attention to the patient, and colleagues trust it because it works.
Without Loss: Virtue That Survives Silence
Wang Bi adds that de (德, virtue) is 常得而無喪, "consistently attained without loss." He's describing a stable kind of strength, not a temporary reputation.
Applause can be lost. De can’t be lost the same way, because applause was never holding it up. Public approval is external and moves with the mood of the crowd, while de draws its steadiness from its source in Dao.
A nurse stays patient and attentive whether or not anyone praises her work. Awards and compliments come and go, but her care rests on a commitment to patients, not on a wish to look compassionate.
Today, this means asking an uncomfortable question. Would you still do this good thing if nobody could ever see it? If the answer is no, the habit belongs to the audience, not to you.
Where would Wang Bi disagree with modern assumptions here? He'd question the idea that unseen goodness is wasted goodness.
Beneficial Without Harm
The next phrase, 利而無害, means "beneficial without harm." It works as a practical test. Real de (德, virtue) helps, and it doesn't advance one interest by damaging the wider order that every interest depends on.
This doesn’t promise that every action feels pleasant or that a wise person can prevent every painful result. It says that the efficacy coming from Dao isn’t exploitative at its root.
The test shifts attention from how noble you look to what your conduct does. A person can speak in moving moral language and still leave confusion, fear or overwork behind.
In practical terms, this looks like a manager who creates clear systems, supports staff and fixes problems fairly. They don't keep asserting their authority. The team works better because the manager's competence produces real benefits, and nobody has to be pressured into admiring it.
Here, Wang Bi's definition joins two things. Virtue lasts (without loss) and it helps (without harm). Because it's grounded, it doesn't need to secure itself through domination or display.
Why the Paradox Isn't a Trick
Put those three phrases together and the opening line stops sounding like a riddle. "The highest virtue makes no display of itself" means that superior de (德, virtue) doesn't depend on announcing, defending or exhibiting its moral status. It's secure because it's grounded, so it doesn't need a reputation to prop it up.
That doesn't make it invisible. Its effects are easy to see, since it benefits others without needless harm. It's "without virtue" only in the sense that it doesn't present itself as a possession, and for that reason it has real de.
A neighbour helps elderly residents with errands every week and turns down public thanks. The help stays consistent and useful, and the lack of self-promotion keeps it from turning into a performance of goodness.
Practicing this means noticing when you reach for the credit. A quiet fix that lasts is worth more than a loud one that needs your name on it.
The Dao Isn't a Rulebook
For Wang Bi, Dao (道, Way) is the ultimate principle behind the variety of things. He links it with wu (無, non-being), which doesn’t mean absolute nothingness. It means the absence of fixed, self-assertive form.
Because Dao doesn’t compete with particular things, it can be the condition from which they arise and function. It isn’t a supernatural person, a physical substance or a moral rulebook. It’s the deepest pattern of naturalness.
A good public transport network works like this. It doesn't personally carry each passenger or command each journey, yet its structure makes countless trips possible. People reach their destinations without thinking about the system underneath.
Wang Bi’s answer to "How is virtue attained?" is 由乎道也, "through Dao." The word 由 points to a source or route. De isn’t self-generated moral capital. It’s received.
That doesn't mean waiting passively for goodness to arrive. It means releasing what blocks natural functioning: vanity, possessiveness, compulsive control and the urge to impose a private scheme on every situation.
One can speak gently, donate publicly or borrow moral language while still being driven by ambition. That imitation lacks the stability of de because it has no root.
On the ground, this means a good coach who adjusts training to what the team needs. They don't impose a rigid programme to prove expertise, and their results come from working with the situation.
Wuwei: Action Without Forcing
Wang Bi doesn’t read 無為 (wuwei, literally non-action) as doing nothing. It means action without unnatural forcing, the kind that isn’t driven by private desire or the need to impose a rigid design on changing circumstances. The sage can still govern, decide, teach and step in.
His commentary asks how de (德, virtue) reaches its fullest form and answers:
Get Charlene H. P. Tan, PhD’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
何以盡德？以無為用,
"By taking wuwei as its function."
The word 用 means use, function or mode of operation.
So virtue isn't complete just by existing as an inner quality. It has to work in the world, and it works best without forcing.
Think of an irrigation system. The water channels follow the land's contours, and the gates open only where and when they're needed. The Dao is the system, de is the water reaching each field, and wuwei is the gate that opens at the right moment.
When vanity drives action, it turns self-conscious and obstructive. It may deliver short-term results, but it no longer carries the quiet efficacy that Wang Bi describes.
In everyday terms: a software team lead removes unnecessary approval steps and lets developers decide routine matters. They stay available for hard problems and don't hover. The team grows more capable, and the lead's contribution shows mainly in how smoothly things run.
Return, and the Solstice
The commentary then says:
故曰，以復而視，則天地之心見。至日而思之，則先王之至睹也。
"Therefore it is said: by contemplating return (fu, 復), the heart of Heaven and Earth becomes visible; by reflecting on it at the solstices (zhiri, 至日), the ultimate vision of the former kings can be seen." (Wang Bi on Daodejing 38)
The wording echoes the Yijing (易經, Classic of Changes), where the hexagram Fu (復, Return) is linked with the solstice and with the "heart of Heaven and Earth." Wang Bi also wrote on the Yijing, so the allusion is a natural one for him.
Return (復) means coming back from outward differentiation toward an underlying source. Things emerge, grow, reach an extreme and return. The visible world is busy, but its busyness has a pattern of release and restoration.
The solstice makes the idea concrete. At the winter solstice the longest night begins to give way to daylight, and at the summer solstice the lengthening days begin to decline. Culmination already holds the start of reversal.
That's useful when success arrives. Picture a filmmaker who wins an award and goes back to watching ordinary people, remembering why they started making films. The prize becomes a turning point and doesn't harden into an identity.
The same view protects against despair. A person who sees the pattern doesn't treat a bad season as the final truth, and doesn't mistake a good one for permanent proof of their worth.
Extinguishing Private Interests
Then comes the sharpest line.
故滅其私而無其身，則四海莫不瞻，遠近莫不至,
"when one extinguishes private interests (si, 私) and becomes selfless, no one under Heaven fails to look towards that person, and those near and far all come."
滅其私 means extinguishing selfish interests. 無其身 literally means being without one's own self as a possessive centre. It doesn't ask for physical disappearance or the loss of personality. It means refusing to treat personal status and advantage as the final measure of action.
Wang Bi has rulers in mind first. A ruler who makes personal interest the centre of government turns the realm into a tool, and people resist being used. That ruler then needs more and more force.
A company director who uses the firm to enrich their family and silence criticism shows the same pattern. Trust drains away, so the director adds stricter rules, surveillance and penalties.
By contrast, people trust someone whose authority isn't constantly turning them into supporters of that person's ego. This isn't a reward for humility. It's what happens when an obstruction is removed.
The standard is deeper than modesty. Someone can perform humility while quietly hoping to be admired for it. Wang Bi asks for the private interest itself to shrink, so that the person no longer keeps asking, "How will this make me look?"
A disaster-response coordinator gives public credit to volunteers, decides by urgent need and accepts criticism without defending their status. People keep bringing information and help because the authority serves the emergency, and not a reputation.
Where Wang Bi Parts Ways With Modern Advice
Modern advice often says to build a personal brand around your values. The assumption is that good work needs regular self-presentation, a managed story and public proof of character.
Wang Bi would likely ask whether the wish to display virtue has taken the place of virtue. Visibility can carry useful information, but it can also make recognition the hidden purpose of the act.
There's a second assumption in the same advice, that self-improvement is a performance with an audience. Wang Bi treats it as a change in where action comes from, so there's nothing to show.
He also wouldn't prescribe self-contempt. Groundedness doesn't mean shrinking yourself. It means letting your actions take direction from what the situation needs, not from what the crowd will clap for.
Practically speaking, this changes what you check. You ask who benefits, what lasts and whether you'd act the same way unobserved. Those questions are harder to post about, which is part of why they work.
Ancient Wisdom, Applied
Here are five ways to put Wang Bi's passage to work, each tied to a different idea above.
1. Test your habits with the quiet rule (without loss).
Pick one good habit, such as checking in on a colleague who's struggling or keeping a promise nobody would notice. Do it for a month without mentioning it to anyone.
Notice whether it feels thinner without an audience, because that tells you where the habit gets its strength.
2. Ask the harm question before the credit question (beneficial without harm).
Before you announce a generous act, ask what it does to the people involved. A donation drive that burdens junior staff, or a public apology that exposes someone else, fails Wang Bi's test even if it looks admirable.
Let the answer decide whether you go ahead, and then how loudly.
3. Remove one thing you control (wuwei).
Find one place where you hover, correct or approve everything, such as a group chat, a family plan or a team task. Hand over one decision completely and step in only if it truly goes wrong.
Judge the result by how capable the other person has become.
4. Schedule a return after every high (return and the solstice).
After a win, a compliment or a good week, spend ten minutes writing down why you started the work. After a bad stretch, do the same.
This keeps praise from becoming an identity and criticism from becoming a verdict.
5. Give the credit away in writing (extinguishing private interests).
At the next project update, name the person whose idea made the difference and leave your own contribution out. Pay attention to what rises in you when you do it.
That reaction shows how much of the work was organised around being seen.
Final Thoughts
Salk's "Could you patent the sun?" works as a small picture of Wang Bi's idea. A good that came from a larger source isn't well served by putting a personal label on it.
The passage doesn't ask you to hide your goodness or to scold yourself for wanting to be liked. It suggests that the more you attend to what's actually needed, the less you need an audience to feel steady.
Wang Bi's wording keeps its edge: de (德, virtue) is received, it lasts, it helps without harming, and it works best when it isn't forced. That leaves one question to carry into the day, which is who your good deeds are really for.
From the series Ancient Wisdom for Living Well, a series exploring this question: How do I stop being exhausted and actually flourish? Next: Your Exhaustion May Come From Trying to Run Everything
