SERIES CRITIQUE / CULTURAL CRITICISM
The Steering Wheel Was Always a Prop
Alex Garland’s DEVS doesn’t argue with you. It just waits until you notice the argument was never yours.
I spend my days writing the rules for multi-agent systems. Memory states, prediction windows, the whole little cosmology. After enough of that you start feeling like the author. You hit enter and the thing does what you told it.
Then I put DEVS on again and that feeling packs up.
You’re sitting there with both hands on the wheel, making the small corrections that feel like character. The road was poured a long time ago.
The destination already used you.
The idea is simple and it doesn’t flinch: agency is a lighting cue. The universe is a clock that put on a face so we’d keep walking. The ugly part isn’t that free will is gone.
It’s that free will is the interface they gave you so you’d walk, willingly, into the room you were always going to occupy.
Tramlines under the campus grass
Can a man steal a secret the future has already filed under his name?
Sergei moves through the Amaya campus like he still owns options: lover, thief, patriot, fool. He walks into the gold room thinking he’s a spy whose cleverness will keep him breathing. He thinks the night is still wet clay.
Forest’s line sits on him like weather that already decided: we fall into the illusion of free will because the tramlines are invisible.
Nothing random happens here. Just an equation that looks like chance because we’re small. The marble rolls because it was pushed.
When the machine shows Sergei his own next minute, hands up, pleading, then dead, he does the only thing a person would do. Grabs the stolen code and runs for the garage. Speed feels like a decision.
The forecast doesn’t hurry. That last burst of choice, the sprint, the panic, the raised hands, wasn’t a man fighting the sentence. It was the sentence being carried out.
He doesn’t get to turn the fear into wisdom. The show spends him to teach the grammar. You want him to have been sloppy, because sloppiness would mean better tradecraft could have saved him.
Garland doesn’t do that kindness.
The wall behind the projection
If you can watch yourself die on a screen, why do you still have to perform the fall?
Lyndon is the brightest moth in the room. He smells a cheat: branching worlds, a horizon the computation can’t cross, some blind spot where a young physicist maybe gets to live.
I know what happens when a system tries to look past its own context window (yikes). The picture falls apart. Lyndon treats that limit like a loophole. He thinks many-worlds math might make a corpse optional, just weather in one universe.
He walks to the edge of the dam anyway. That’s the part that stays ugly.
A smart man can look at the tramlines and still ride them, because looking is not stepping off, and the code has no sacrament for refusal that isn’t already priced in. Lyndon’s death is the show saying a limit is not a door. Past a certain resolution the projection stops being a map and starts being the ground.
Knowledge doesn’t open anything. It furnishes the last room and leaves you in it.
A god that fits in a cube
Who gets to sit in the operator’s chair and still call it science?
Katie doesn’t flinch the way the rest of us do. She looks at the gold room and sees a deity that happens to run on servers. No wonder, no whimsy. Just liturgy inside a Faraday cage.
Get Gabriel Paiva’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Stewart’s warning hangs over the whole clean campus: big decisions about our future being made by people who know almost nothing about our past.
Forest isn’t a visionary in the keynote sense. He’s a grieving father who built a telescope and pointed it at his own wound. He’s building a resurrection machine and calling the grief engineering.
Simulation in this show is godhood without the courtesy. The operator doesn’t become divine by understanding the universe. He becomes divine by turning living people into a feed he can scrub backward until a dead girl almost breathes.
Katie keeps the picture coherent. She lets the bodies arrange themselves. That’s how a scientist becomes a priest without changing clothes.
If that sounds like devotion, it is. Devotion is just determinism with better lighting.
The picture that required a death
Why did someone have to die for the timeline to stay one stubborn point?
Because a branching world would have given Forest his daughter in some other fold and left him with no excuse to build the church. The show toys with the multiverse the way a knife toys with light, then picks the crueler version: one world, tramlines, one death per coordinate.
Sitting in my hometown in Brazil, watching the rain do what rain does, Kenton is the part that actually bothers me.
He treats violence as a way to author the secret, to keep the campus from leaking. Determinism is his anesthetic. If the trigger was always going to be pulled, the hand that pulls it is innocent.
He kills without weight because he thinks the universe did it first.
That’s where Garland’s actual point about the technology lives. The code doesn’t resolve the dread. It just hands people a fresh alibi for instincts they already had. The machine doesn’t numb the grief. People do that, and they use the machine as the excuse.
The fixed point is why the deaths can’t be negotiated. If they could, Forest would have to admit the machine is a story he’s telling himself. He’d rather be a god than a father who missed.
So the picture holds. We watch it.
Forest says the quiet part:
"I took nothing from you. I can’t take what you never had. The sense that you were participating was only ever an illusion."
Watching is the only participation anyone was going to get. And the wheel in your hands keeps turning because the trick requires that it feel like yours.
CONCLUSION: GOSPEL ACCORDING TO A VENTURE CAPITALIST
DEVS is Garland’s Book of Job for guys who think wearing a Patagonia fleece to a seed round makes them Prometheus. It’s a show that doesn’t just dissect Silicon Valley’s god complex: it leaves it bleeding on a sterile concrete floor. The plot has the emotional and philosophical depth of an empty cleanroom: there are no revelations, no mind-bending twists, no actual questions. Just Alex Garland’s immaculate, gold-plated cinematography doing all the heavy lifting for a script that mistakes silence for profundity.
Production & Technical Credits
- Creator, Writer & Director: Alex Garland
- Director of Photography: Rob Hardy, BSC
- Production Designer: Mark Digby
- Original Score: Geoff Barrow, Ben Salisbury & The Insects
- Network & Studio: FX on Hulu / DNA Films
🔥Final Rating: ★★★ (3/5)
A masterclass in dressing up pure, unprocessed grief as an enterprise SaaS product.
🍸 For the Palo Alto Visionary: Pair with an overpriced adaptogen tincture, a 4:00 AM cold plunge, and the quiet dread that your Series A AI startup is just a $20/month API wrapper around fatalism.
Epilogue: “The sense that you were participating was only ever an illusion.” Forest drops the mask, and every tech founder in the room nods solemnly like they didn’t just spend eight episodes watching a billionaire build an omniscient panopticon solely to avoid going to therapy. The code compiles. The demo sells. And the wheel in your hands keeps turning, purely so you don’t notice the tracks were laid before you even bought the ticket.
You were always going to clap 50 times for this post.
Don’t fight the tramlines: fulfill the forecast below. 👇
