The River Doesn’t Take Stock
On thirty weeks of writing, the measuring mind, and learning what progress can mean.
Thirty weeks.
I noticed the milestone this morning, and almost immediately felt the familiar pull: the conditioned reflex to pause, look back, audit, and weigh. The old accounting question resurfaced: What is all of this actually adding up to?
And then, right behind it, a quieter question arrived:
Does the river ever stop to take stock?
Of course, a river cannot ask such a question. But the image stayed with me. It moves around boulders, slows in the shallows, and changes course with the terrain. It does not pause at every bend to compare itself with the river it was yesterday.
Sitting with that image, I began to wonder whether I could learn to look at my own journey a little differently.
THE MEASURING MIND
I spent much of my adult life in environments where measurement mattered. Seventeen years in financial services taught me to pay attention to targets, returns, and results. Later, in the catering business, every weekend brought practical questions: Did the client return? Did the margins hold? Could the next order be managed better?
There was nothing wrong with those questions. They helped me make decisions and meet responsibilities. The measuring mind is not a character flaw. It is often a useful instrument. The difficulty begins when an instrument becomes the only way we know how to value ourselves.
When I started writing thirty weeks ago, I carried some of that conditioning with me. How many readers? Is the work reaching anyone? Is this effort going somewhere? Sometimes I could feel those questions arriving before I had even finished appreciating the act of writing.
There have been moments when a piece was ready to publish, yet my attention had already moved beyond the words to how they might be received. The piece had not even entered the world, and already I was putting it on trial.
I still care whether people read what I write. I hope the work reaches others, and I cannot pretend that practical outcomes are irrelevant. But readership cannot tell me everything about what thirty weeks of writing have done to the person at the desk.
THE TRAP OF PERFECTION
The measuring habit has another companion: the wish to get everything exactly right.
The essays have not all arrived with the same ease. Some weeks the words came readily; other weeks I had to stay with an uncertain thought until it began to take shape. At times I have looked back at a draft and wished I had expressed something more clearly.
I am learning that wanting to do good work is different from demanding flawless work. Care makes me revise a sentence. Perfectionism can make me hesitate to let the sentence exist at all.
Get Gokulramaki’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Financial services taught me the value of accuracy. Catering taught me the importance of preparation. I do not want to discard either lesson. But writing asks me to make room for another kind of discipline: to work honestly, improve what I can, and allow an imperfect piece to be part of an evolving practice.
A river does not travel in a pristine, straight line. Its bends are not evidence that it has failed to move.
WHAT THIRTY WEEKS HAVE GIVEN ME
So what has changed, if the external questions are still largely open?
I did not expect, when I began, to travel this far or to learn so much about the person doing the writing. My impression of myself has been changing. I notice more clearly when anxiety begins to take over. I am a little more willing to sit with an unanswered question. And the words on the page have gradually become less concerned with sounding impressive and more concerned with being true to what I have experienced.
None of this means I have outgrown fear or stopped looking for signs of progress. I still have days when I compare, calculate, or wonder whether I am doing enough. But sometimes I notice the old habit before it carries me away. That small space between the question and my reaction feels like a kind of progress too.
The practical questions that accompanied the first week have not vanished. I still need to think about where this work can lead and how to make it sustainable. Taking stock has its place. I simply do not want every act of writing to become a verdict on my future.
THE RIVER AND THE OCEAN
I once imagined that there would be a point at which the journey would feel complete: a clear destination, a reassuring result, a final answer to whether the effort had been worthwhile.
Thirty weeks later, I am less certain that life works that way. A river may bend, narrow, widen, or find a course we did not expect. The image does not promise that every journey ends where we hope. It reminds me instead that movement can involve adjustment, and that a change of course need not erase the distance already travelled.
I want to approach writing in that spirit. To continue with care, to pay attention to what is and is not working, to make changes when they are needed — and not demand that every week reveal the final destination.
Thirty weeks. The chain unbroken. I am grateful for that consistency, but I hope I would still recognise the value of this journey if the rhythm were interrupted someday. The practice is larger than the count.
Perhaps the most important thing these weeks have given me is not a clearer picture of where I am going, but a different understanding of the person making the journey.
Not what the river collected along its banks, but how it changed as it moved.
The river does not take stock. I sometimes need to.
I am simply learning not to mistake the ledger for the whole story.
And thirty weeks in, I am still learning to flow.
•••
Part of The Surrender Series — reflections on uncertainty, presence, and learning to remain open in the middle of becoming.
