Title :Humanity, Religion, God, and Morality
Subtitle:My personal Philosophy.
Humanity, Religion, God, and Morality
My Personal Philosophy
By Istiak Hasan
A personal essay on human dignity, conscience, faith, and justice.
Important Note
This essay presents my own personal theory, thoughts, and questions. Nothing in it is intended to insult, belittle, or disrespect any religion, religious community, or ethnic group. I am expressing my personal perspective, not claiming that it is the final or absolute truth.
I may be mistaken about some of the things I have written. If someone can point out a genuine mistake, explain where my reasoning is flawed, or offer a thoughtful counterargument, I would genuinely welcome that. I am open to learning, reconsidering my views, and correcting my understanding.
An invitation to thoughtful discussion, not an attack on anyone's beliefs.
1. Where It All Begins
I often find myself thinking about the world, the universe, humanity, religion, and the existence of a creator. Sometimes, certain questions come to my mind, and the answers do not always align with conventional religious beliefs or common perceptions.
One of the most important questions I have is: Why do humans exist? What is the purpose of our existence? If a creator exists, what could be His purpose? And if no creator exists, how can we explain our existence?
As I began thinking about these questions, I gradually developed some personal ideas of my own. I do not claim that they are absolute truths. Rather, I consider them my personal philosophy regarding the universe, religion, morality, and human existence.
2. My Two Perspectives on the Existence of a Creator
The First Perspective: Perhaps There Is No Creator.
Perhaps the universe came into existence through some natural process that humanity has not yet fully understood. Science is gradually uncovering the mysteries of the universe, its origins, and its existence. Maybe we will discover much more as science advances in the future.
According to this perspective, human life ends completely with death. There may be no soul, afterlife, or reincarnation. Human consciousness and emotions are connected to the functioning of the brain. Once brain activity permanently ceases, our conscious existence may also come to an end.
It is somewhat like falling asleep and never waking up again. However, this does not mean that we would experience darkness after death. Rather, there may be no consciousness left to experience anything at all.
I do not consider this possibility impossible.
The Second Perspective: Perhaps There Is a Creator.
However, that creator may not necessarily be associated with any particular religion. Perhaps He created humanity without expecting people to follow a specific religious identity or perform formal acts of worship.
Perhaps He gave humans conscience, intelligence, emotions, empathy, and the ability to distinguish between right and wrong so that they could use their reasoning to live in this world.
According to this perspective, what matters most to the creator may be a person's morality, their treatment of others, and the good and bad actions they perform throughout their life.
In other words, perhaps what matters more is how someone treats other people rather than how many times they perform religious rituals or prayers.
This idea has some similarities with Deism and Humanism, although it does not fit entirely into any single philosophical category.
3. Do We Need Religion to Understand Right and Wrong?
In my opinion, people do not always need religious instructions to understand the difference between right and wrong.
For example, murdering someone, abusing innocent people, stealing someone else's property, or destroying another person's family are clearly harmful actions. A person does not necessarily need religious education to understand why these things are wrong.
A person with a healthy conscience can recognize the harmful nature of such actions through reasoning and empathy.
Similarly, feeding someone who is hungry, helping helpless people, standing beside someone in difficult times, and protecting the rights of others are good actions that people can recognize through their own conscience.
Human beings possess empathy, a sense of justice, the ability to cooperate, and the ability to understand the suffering of others. These qualities do not belong exclusively to any particular religion.
Of course, people can disagree about complicated moral situations. However, I do not find it logical to assume that someone cannot understand morality simply because they do not follow a religion.
4. Religious Identity vs. A Person's True Identity
To me, every human being is first and foremost a human being. Their religious identities may differ, but their fundamental human dignity is equal.
Imagine there are two religious communities in the world, A and B. At some point in history, certain members of community A oppressed the people of community B, killed them, and deprived them of their rights.
However, one individual from community A refuses to support those injustices. He stands against the wrongdoing committed by members of his own community and helps the helpless people of community B.
Now, should that individual be considered a bad person simply because he belongs to community A?
In my opinion, absolutely not. His religious affiliation is part of his personal identity. But his actions are what reveal his moral character.
Likewise, if someone from community B commits injustices against people from community A, their wrongdoing cannot be justified simply because they belong to community B.
A person's actions are their own responsibility. Holding someone accountable for the religious identity or actions of other people is not fair.
5. The Difference Between Worship and Morality
One of the most important parts of my philosophy is that practising religion and being a good person are two different things.
Imagine two individuals.
The first person spends his entire life worshipping a creator. He regularly prays, performs religious rituals, and identifies himself as a religious person. However, in his everyday life, he harms others, deceives people, abuses the weak, and makes other people's lives miserable for his own benefit.
The second person may not believe in any creator at all. He does not perform religious worship. However, he does not harm others, helps people in need, refuses to support injustice, and tries to live an honest life within his abilities.
From a moral perspective, I find the second person's behaviour more admirable.
Because worship does not erase someone's wrongdoing. A person cannot prove that they are good simply by performing religious rituals while harming other people.
I am not against worship. My argument is that worship and moral responsibility are not substitutes for one another.
This raises a question in my mind: If a creator gave humans conscience and morality, why should formal worship be considered more important than using that conscience to help others?
My assumption is that if a creator exists, He should value people's true character and actions.
6. Birth Religion and Justice in the Afterlife
One of my biggest questions about religion concerns people's religious identities at birth.
Some people are born into Muslim families, some into Hindu families, and others into Christian families. There are also people who grow up in families where no religious beliefs are practised.
Get Istiakhasan’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
A child cannot choose their family, country, or religion at birth. Generally, their thoughts and beliefs develop through the environment in which they grow up.
So, how fair would it be to judge someone in the afterlife solely because of their religious identity at birth?
Imagine one person who spends their entire life practising their religion but commits injustices against others. On the other hand, another person follows a different religion or does not believe in any religion at all, yet never harms others, stands against injustice, and helps people in need.
If an afterlife truly exists and people are judged there, I believe the second person's good actions should also matter.
In my understanding of justice, a person's background, intentions, circumstances, and actions should all be considered alongside their religious identity.
Simply being born into or following a particular religion does not automatically make someone good or bad.
7. The Question of Religious Birth and Divine Justice
According to many religious beliefs, a creator is responsible for creating human beings and determining the circumstances into which they are born. For example, in Islam, Allah is understood to be the creator who brings people into existence and determines the families into which they are born.
A person does not choose their parents, family, country, or the religious environment in which they grow up. If someone is born into a Hindu or Christian family, they are naturally raised by those parents, surrounded by that community, and taught the beliefs and practices of that household.
From childhood, people generally learn to trust their parents. They grow up seeing their parents practise a particular religion, and it is natural for them to adopt many of the same beliefs. Those beliefs become part of their upbringing, culture, and understanding of the world.
Now imagine that someone from another religion tells them that their own religion is false and that a different religion is the only true one. It is not surprising that they may find this difficult to accept. They have grown up trusting their parents and the environment around them, just as people from other religious backgrounds have.
This leads me to a difficult question about divine justice. Suppose Allah is the one true creator, or suppose the true creator is the God worshipped in another religion, such as Jesus in Christian belief or another deity. If that creator placed a person in a family that followed a different religion, and that person grew up practising the religion of their family, would it be fair to send them to Hell simply because they did not accept a different religion?
In that situation, the person did not choose their birthplace, parents, or initial religious beliefs. Those circumstances were beyond their control. If the creator determined those circumstances, then punishing someone solely for growing up within the religious environment they were given seems difficult to reconcile with the idea of perfect justice.
This raises another question in my mind: if a creator wanted every human being to follow only one particular religion in order to reach Heaven, why would humanity be born into so many different religious communities, cultures, and belief systems in the first place? One might expect the world to have a single religious tradition, with everyone raised as followers of that same faith.
I recognize that different religions have their own explanations for this question, including ideas about free will, guidance, accountability, and the knowledge available to each person. My point is not that I have conclusively disproved those explanations. Rather, I believe that a fair judgment should take a person's upbringing, opportunities, understanding, and ability to recognize what is true into account.
For me, the central issue is responsibility: how can someone be held fully responsible for a religious identity and upbringing that they never chose?
8. Can People of All Religions Reach the Same Destination?
My personal belief is that people from all religions should have the possibility of achieving a good outcome in the afterlife through their good actions.
I do not believe that someone automatically deserves Paradise simply because they practise their religion, even if their actions throughout life are unjust and harmful.
Likewise, I do not find it fair to assume that someone's good deeds become meaningless simply because they follow another religion or have no religious beliefs.
In my opinion, if a creator exists and truly believes in justice, then a person's moral character and actions should matter more than their religious identity.
This perspective may differ from the teachings of many established religions. Islam and several other religions, in particular, have their own teachings about the relationship between faith, worship, and good deeds. My personal philosophy does not completely align with those teachings.
9. Religious Blindness and Conflict in the World
In my opinion, one of the major reasons behind religious divisions, hatred, and conflicts is religious extremism, blind faith, and intolerance.
Sometimes, people become so attached to their religious identity that they lose the ability to show basic respect towards people of other religions.
Believing that your own religion is true is one thing. Hating other religions is something entirely different.
A person can be deeply religious and still respect people who follow different beliefs. Therefore, my disagreement is not with religious faith itself, but with the kind of blind belief that makes people willing to harm others.
I believe that if people gave importance to their shared human identity alongside their religious identity, many conflicts caused by religion could be reduced.
Of course, not every problem in the world is caused by religion. Political, economic, and personal interests also create conflicts. However, reducing religious intolerance could certainly reduce many divisions and conflicts related to religion.
10. To Me, People of All Religions Are Equal
To me, people of every religion belong to the same human race.
A Muslim, a Hindu, a Christian, a Buddhist, or an atheist—all have emotions, families, dreams, struggles, and the right to live a good life.
Religion is one part of a person's beliefs and lifestyle. But it does not define their entire identity.
A person's entire character cannot be determined by the religion they follow. Every religious community has people who do both good and bad things.
That is why I do not see any fundamental division between people of different religions. Their beliefs may differ, but their value as human beings remains equal.
11. The Right to Question Religion and Express My Thoughts
One issue that I find especially important is the freedom to ask questions about religion, faith, and the creator. I believe that questioning something does not automatically mean rejecting it. A person can have faith and still have doubts, curiosity, or questions that they genuinely want to understand.
Yet, in some communities, people are made to feel that even asking a question about religion is wrong. Some are told that questioning a religious belief—or asking about the creator—makes them a kafir, a disbeliever, or an atheist, or that it could lead them to Hell. I do not find that assumption reasonable. Asking a question is not the same as denying a religion, and it certainly does not automatically make someone an atheist or a disbeliever.
Sometimes, a person may ask a question that a religious scholar or another knowledgeable person cannot answer. Not knowing an answer is not itself a failure; no human being knows everything. But instead of admitting uncertainty or discussing the question, some people respond by attacking the person who asked and giving them labels. In my opinion, fear and accusations do not answer a question. They only discourage people from thinking openly.
Human beings learn by asking questions, examining ideas, and being willing to reconsider what they believe. It is natural that this process may include questions about religion and even about the creator. If human beings have been given intelligence and curiosity, I see no reason why those qualities should be abandoned when the subject becomes religion.
I also think many people remain silent about their doubts because they are afraid of being judged by family, society, or religious communities. They may worry that others will call them kafir or atheist, even when they are simply trying to understand something. A question can be thoughtful, mistaken, difficult, or based on incomplete knowledge. Whatever the case, it should be possible to discuss it respectfully and examine the reasoning behind it.
This essay is an expression of that freedom. I am putting forward my own questions and thoughts honestly. I do not claim that every idea I have is correct, and I am open to being challenged with sound reasoning. But I do not believe that I should have to hide my thoughts out of fear that someone may attach a label to me.
To me, every person should have the freedom to examine their beliefs, ask sincere questions, and express personal views without being automatically condemned for doing so. Questioning is part of thinking; it is not, by itself, proof of disbelief.
12. Final Thoughts: The Foundation of My Philosophy
Throughout this essay, I have shared my personal thoughts and questions about the universe, the existence of a creator, religion, morality, religious identity, divine justice, and the freedom to question what we believe. I want to bring those ideas together here.
I do not claim to know whether a creator exists. I can consider the possibility that the universe came into existence through natural processes, and I can also consider the possibility that a creator exists beyond the boundaries of any one religion. I present neither possibility as a proven truth; they are two perspectives that I continue to think about.
I believe that human beings can understand much of right and wrong through conscience, empathy, intelligence, and reason. A person does not need to belong to a particular religion to be honest, compassionate, fair, or helpful. Likewise, religious worship is a personal choice, but worship should never be treated as a substitute for moral responsibility. A person's actions towards others matter.
I also question whether it is fair to judge someone simply by the religion into which they were born. No one chooses their parents, birthplace, family, or childhood religious environment. If an afterlife and divine judgment exist, I believe a person's circumstances, understanding, intentions, choices, and treatment of other people should be considered—not merely the religious identity they inherited.
To me, people of every religion, as well as people who follow no religion, share the same human dignity. Religious differences should not be used to justify hatred, discrimination, or collective blame. I am not arguing that people should abandon their religions or stop worshipping. My concern is with blind intolerance that makes people look down on others or causes them harm.
I also believe that sincere questions should not be silenced through fear or labels. People should be able to think, ask, discuss, and reconsider. A person's question may contain a mistake, but that is a reason to explain and discuss—not a reason to condemn the person asking it.
Ultimately, this essay is not a claim that I have discovered the final truth about God, religion, or the afterlife. It is an honest account of my present understanding and the questions I believe are worth considering. Its central message is that humanity, conscience, morality, and justice should matter more than religious labels. I believe people should be judged by their character and actions, not simply by the religion they were born into or the community they belong to.
I know my views may contain mistakes, and I remain open to thoughtful criticism, counterarguments, and learning. I do not expect everyone to agree with me. I only hope that these ideas will be considered through reason and open discussion, rather than dismissed simply because they question familiar beliefs.
“Being human comes first; religious identity comes after.”
— Istiak Hasan
