How to Evaluate Microlearning Software for Employee Training
Employee training should continuously grow and adapt to keep pace with evolving business goals, new technological developments, and the skills needed by your workforce.
Traditional training methods are often ineffective for providing quick and timely learning without causing a disruption to the normal flow of work operations.
Microlearning software helps by offering employees short, targeted learning moments that can be accessed at will. But choosing an appropriate micro-learning platform means that feature comparison is only part of the decision-making process. An organization will have to look closely at learning effectiveness together with technological compatibility, scalability and whether business impacts can be measured or not.
1. Identify and Define Your Organizational Objectives Along with Workforce Requirements
Before you even start looking at microlearning vendors, pinpoint exactly those gaps in performance that your organization wants to close up. These may range from a total lack of product knowledge, non-compliance, a lack of effective onboarding, to inability of using new technologies even after some time.
An effective microlearning solution will address specific learning objectives as opposed to merely offering smaller version of existing learning modules.
Review how employees spend their working hours, whether they favor short lessons or something that fits better to their personal schedules or a combination thereof. Think also about how to ensure access to learning by everyone in every part of the company. Don’t forget that one of the ways to learn is to take breaks and watch a video or read a text as part of one’s daily routine.
Identify a set of baseline performance indicators like course completions, assessment scores, time to competency and error rates. These measurements will serve as a comparison to see if a change results in significant improvements.
2. Assess Content Creation and Personalization Capabilities
The ability to provide a varied range of content is one of the primary elements to compare microlearning platforms. Check to see if you can have software that will support interactive videos, short quizzes, scenario-based training, simulations, and mobile-ready learning.
The learning platform should also allow teachers to revise content with ease when products, policies, and operations evolve. AI-assisted authoring can be a great time saver in content creation, whereas adaptive learning recommendation engines can recommend employees the right content.
However, automation cannot be the only reason instructional material is being changed. Consider if the microlearning platform still makes room for subject-matter expert validation, proper assessment development and learning goals alignment.
3. Evaluate Integration, Accessibility and Scalability
The implementation of enterprise learning technology depends heavily on whether it can work within the already existent digital ecosystem of the company. It requires checking with the learning management system (LMS), human resources information system, collaboration tools, and identity governance solution to find if the technology will be able to integrate.
SCORM and xAPI are two standards that allow content to be interoperable and learning activities (such as tracking them) may still depend on how the platform is set up in that regard. It is necessary to determine whether a platform conforms to your current system before making any commitment.
It cannot be stressed enough how important accessibility is. Test if keyboard navigation is easy, captions are available, and screen-reader users are well handled. There are some accessibility standards that the application should conform to. Moreover, it should be able to be accessed by employees wherever they are, irrespective of the device or the type of internet connection.
The microlearning solution should be scalable in order to continue supporting learners, increasing the library of learning contents, handling more reports requirements, and keeping everything running smoothly without major downtime or performance issues even after expanding learner numbers and/or content library size. It is necessary for the system to provide a consistent quality experience despite the changes.
4. Review Analytics and Learning Effectiveness
Training completion rates on their own may not indicate if training is enhancing performance at work. A good learning content platform should also give you detailed analytics that show how many people joined, what they retained from the content, test performance, and progress in learning.
Get Joe walker’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Find out if the platform allows administrators to group data by department, job role, location, or competency. It’s possible that these tools will highlight long-standing skill issues and even find out who among the team members needs a refresher.
Wherever feasible link up a learning metrics with a business metrics. Like, you may want to look at how selling training effectiveness was accompanied with product demonstration quality, while compliance learning could be checked for assessment correctness and audit results.
A proper set of criteria that is used to evaluate performance of a program should be able to differentiate a genuine cause and effect relationship vs just correlation and also consider the influence of other external factors on performance.
5. Consider Data Security, Vendor Support, and Total Cost
Determine the measures the vendor adopts for:
- Reviewing data encryption,
- Giving access to staff only depending on their role,
- Retention
Ensure the vendor also takes into consideration the privacy of data and includes in the contract the governing provisions for information related to the worker. Are they compliant with the requirements of your organization’s regulations and security?
Find out details about vendor’s support such as implementation, technical assistance (both on-site and remote support), administrator training, product development.
Do not get swayed by only sales pitch presentation. Ask for demos showcasing your training scenarios or realistic ones to get the full picture.
Make sure you factor in licensing, implementation (setup), content migration, integration of modules with other systems, maintenance of platform/system/website and ongoing admin expenses, among other costs.
Although subscription price per month may seem cheap or even affordable for a small business, there could probably be huge operational costs that remain hidden from view.
Beyond learning and education technology, many companies looking at learning partnerships can also check a provider like Infopro Learning when comparing learning strategy and delivery on a bigger scale.
6. Conduct a Pilot Before Making the Final Decision
In a pilot, an organization can practically evaluate platform compatibility of the technology and its suitability to the needs of the organization. The pilot should involve the selection of a sample employee group and testing of the most relevant modules for that group over a specified period of time. After the pilot phase is complete, feedback on various issues such as ease of use, availability of the tool, relevance of the content, and overall feeling about the product should be gathered.
Compare the results of your pilot test with baseline measurements and predefined success criteria. Include employee engagement, knowledge retention, completion time, and operational impact if they are measurable.
Use the data thus compiled to detect possible implementation risks, make your content better, and set an achievable implementation pace.
Conclusion
Testing microlearning software means checking not just the pedagogical value of the product but also features like integration with existing systems, availability of data and insights, security, scalability, and cost. A good microlearning solution should deliver bite-sized learning experiences directly connected to workforce skills and business-related goals that can be tracked. Enterprises are likely, on their part, to be wise investors by setting clear criteria for successful outcomes, checking up the vendors’ advertisements, and running systematic pilot tests. Their investment will enhance employee capabilities and, thus, will result in sustained performance improvement.
