No Elevator. No Shortcut. No Apology: 10 Things I Learned Taking the Stairs Through My First Year of Law School
By Rick Metzgar | @RickLawSchool | March 2026
I am 45 years old. I am a first-year evening law student at Wilmington University School of Law. I work full-time as a Development Director at The Salvation Army in Baltimore. I have three sons. I am the first person in my family to attend law school.
Before any of that, I was a vo-tech kid from Baltimore. Eastern Tech, Class of 1998. The plan after high school was straightforward: get a job, pay your bills, figure the rest out later. Nobody in my family had gone to college. Nobody had gone to graduate school. Nobody had gone to law school. The path was work, not education, and for a long time that path served me well.
In 2003, I talked my way into mortgage banking with no degree, no connections, and no safety net. For twenty years, I closed loans through every market phase — boom, crash, and recovery. I sat across the table from borrowers, underwriters, real estate agents, title companies, and regulators. I learned how deals are structured, how negotiations work, and how people behave when money is on the table.
But somewhere along the way, I decided the education I never got wasn’t something I was willing to leave on the table. In 2012, while still working full-time in mortgage banking, I enrolled in undergrad. Night classes. Four years. Worked all day, went to class at night, came home and did it again. I earned my degree in 2016, more than a decade after most people finish theirs. Nobody handed it to me. I went and got it on my own schedule.
And then, in 2025, I did the most unreasonable thing yet. I enrolled in law school. Evening classes again. Full-time job again. Three sons at home again. First generation, again.
This article is for every adult learner over 35 who is in law school, thinking about law school, or was told they were too old to start. It is not a collection of platitudes. This reflects my current experience as an ongoing learner.
1. Learn to Learn Again
This is the one nobody warns you about, and it is the one that will humble you faster than anything else in the building.
You walk into law school with fifteen or twenty years of professional experience. You have closed deals, managed teams, navigated crises, and built a career through sheer competence and discipline. You know how to process information. You know how to solve problems. You know how to perform under pressure.
None of that translates the way you think it will.
Law school does not reward what you know. It values your thinking. And the way you have been thinking for two decades in the professional world is not the way a law professor needs you to think on an exam. The professional world rewards decisiveness, efficiency, and bottom-line answers. Legal analysis rewards nuance, ambiguity, and the ability to argue both sides of a question before reaching a conclusion. These are fundamentally different cognitive processes, and the sooner you accept that your professional instincts are an asset but not a substitute for legal reasoning, the sooner you start really learning.
I had to rebuild my entire study method from scratch during my first semester. I had to accept that knowing how to close a million-dollar mortgage loan did not mean I knew how to spot the consideration issue in a Contracts hypothetical. Humbling does not begin to describe it.
But here is the thing about being humbled at 45 that is different from being humbled at 25: you have been humbled before. You survived it before. And the skills you have built recovering from professional setbacks, the resilience, the discipline, the refusal to quit, those are the skills that carry you through law school. Not the knowledge. The character.
2. Start Your Outline on Day One
If you wait until reading period to build your course outline, you have already lost weeks of learning you will never get back.
Start your outline the first week of class. It will be ugly. It will be incomplete. It will have gaps, wrong headings, and sections you will completely rewrite by midterms. That is the point. The outline is not a finished product you create at the end of the semester. It is a living document that grows as your understanding grows. Every class adds something. Every case refines something. Every hypothetical your professor poses tests a boundary that your outline needs to capture.
The students who outline early are not just more prepared for the exam. They are learning the material twice: once in class and once while organizing it into their outline. That repetition, the act of hearing a concept and then immediately translating it into a structured framework, is the difference between recognition and understanding. Recognition means you remember seeing the rule. Understanding means you can apply it to facts you have never seen before. Outlining early builds understanding. Outlining late builds panic.
3. Update Your Outline Every Single Week
This is the companion to starting early, and it is the one most people skip.
You sit in class on a Tuesday night. Your professor drops a hypothetical that completely reframes how you understood a doctrine. You think to yourself, “I will add that to my outline this weekend.” The weekend is coming. You have work, children, errands, exhaustion, and a hundred other demands on your time. Monday begins. The hypothetical is gone. The insight is gone. The connection your professor made between the doctrine and the exam is gone.
Within twenty-four hours of every class, open your outline. Add what you learned. Revise what you misunderstood. Flag what you are still confused about. The twenty-four-hour window matters because your recall is sharpest immediately after class. A week later, you are reconstructing from memory. A month later, you are guessing. For adult learners juggling careers and families, this discipline is not optional. It is the only way to keep the material from slipping through the cracks that a full-time life creates.
4. Schedule Office Hours and Walk In with a Plan
Do not show up to a professor’s office and say, “I’m confused about consideration.” That is not a plan. That is a confession.
Before you walk into office hours, identify the specific concept you are working with. Prepare a specific question. If possible, bring your own attempted analysis so the professor can see exactly where your reasoning breaks down. “Professor, I worked through this hypothetical using the Restatement section we discussed in class, and I reached this conclusion, but I am not sure my analysis holds because of this specific element” is a fundamentally different conversation than “I don’t get it.”
Professors respect preparation. They can tell immediately whether you have done the work or whether you are hoping they will do the work for you. Office hours with a plan are the highest-value thirty minutes in law school. Office hours without a plan are a waste of both your time and theirs. As adult learners, our time is more limited than the traditional students who can linger for an hour. Make every minute count by showing up ready.
5. Plan Only for Excellence. Scratch the Rest.
This one is for the adult learners specifically, because we are the ones who struggle with it most.
You have a full-time career. You have a family. You have financial obligations that do not pause because you enrolled in law school. You have approximately four usable hours per day after work and before exhaustion makes everything you read incomprehensible. You do not have the luxury of doing everything. So stop trying.
Identify the activities that produce excellent results and commit to those. Scratch the good. Scratch the average. Scratch the things you do because everyone else does them. If a study group is not making you demonstrably better, leave it. If a supplement is not clicking with how you learn, drop it. If an activity is not moving you toward your specific goal, it is stealing time from one that will.
Get Rick Metzgar’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Your time is the scarcest resource you have. You cannot manufacture more of it. You cannot borrow it. You cannot recover it once it is spent. Every hour you give to an activity that produces average results is an hour you cannot give to an activity that produces excellent results. Spending your time like it costs what it costs: everything.
6. Stop Reading Cases Like Novels. Extract the Rule.
First semester, I spent hours dissecting every assigned case like it was a piece of literature. I could tell you the name of every witness. I could recite the procedural history in granular detail. I could reconstruct the facts with the precision of a journalist covering a trial.
I could not tell you the rule the court applied.
That is backwards. Cases are vehicles for rules. The facts matter because they show you how the rule operates in practice. The procedural history matters because it tells you what standard of review applies and how the court’s analysis was constrained. But the rule, the legal principle the court articulated and applied, is what you are tested on. Your professor will not ask you to recite the facts of Hadley v. Baxendale. Your professor will give you a new set of facts and ask you to apply the foreseeability rule that Hadley established.
Read the case. Extract the rule. Understand how the rule was applied to those specific facts. Understand the policy behind the rule. Then move on. If you are spending ninety minutes on a single case, you are reading for comprehension when you should be reading for extraction. Comprehension is a byproduct of extraction, not the other way around.
7. Engage the Material. Build Your Own Hypotheticals.
This is the single highest-value study activity I discovered this year, and it is the one that most directly changed my performance.
Take a rule you learned in class. Change the facts. What if the plaintiff was a business instead of a consumer? What if the breach was willful instead of inadvertent? What if there were two defendants instead of one? What if the injury was emotional rather than physical? Write a one-paragraph analysis applying the rule to your new facts.
This exercise forces you to move from recognition to application. Recognition means you remember the rule when you see it. Application means you can deploy the rule on facts you have never encountered before. The exam will present facts you have never seen. If the first time you apply a rule to unfamiliar facts is on exam day, you are training for combat by reading about it in a book. Build the muscle before the fight.
One of my professors teaches that the difference between an A and a B on an exam is the ability to analogize and distinguish cases. You cannot do that if you have only ever seen the rule applied to one set of facts. Creating your own hypotheticals gives you a library of applications to draw from when the exam asks you to reason by analogy. The larger your library, the faster you find the right comparison.
8. Network Like Your Career Depends on It. Because It Does.
You are not just getting a degree. You are entering a profession. The people you meet now, your classmates, your professors, the attorneys you reach out to, the bar association events you attend, the LinkedIn connections you make, these are the seeds of a career that will span decades.
As an adult learner, you have something the twenty-five-year-olds do not: you already know how to build professional relationships. You have been doing it for fifteen or twenty years. You know how to send a cold email that gets a response. You know how to walk into a room and introduce yourself to someone you have never met. You know how to follow up without being pushy and how to add value to a relationship before you ask for anything in return.
Use that skill. It is your single greatest competitive advantage over every traditional student in the building. They are learning professional networking for the first time. You have been doing it since before they graduated high school. Every email you send to a practicing attorney, every informational interview you request, every conversation you have at a CLE or bar event, compounds over time. The relationships you build in law school are not separate from your career. They are the foundation of it.
9. Build Strategic Alliances Now
This is the extension of networking, but it is specific enough to deserve its own lesson.
Your classmates are not just study partners. They are your future co-counsel. Your future opposing counsel. Your future referral sources. Your future judges. The person sitting next to you in Torts tonight might be the attorney you call in ten years when a client walks in with a case outside your practice area. The person you help with an outline this semester might be the person who recommends you for a position next year. The person you treat with respect during a heated class discussion might be the person who hires you five years from now.
Law school is a small world. The legal profession is smaller. Establish your alliances at this stage, when the risks are minimal and opportunities for collaboration are readily available. Study groups, outline-sharing partnerships, informal mentorships with upper-division students, all of these are investments that pay dividends for decades. Build relationships before you need them. The time to plant the tree was yesterday. The second-best time is today.
10. Treat Everyone with Respect, but Read the Room
This is two lessons wearing one number.
The first is simple and non-negotiable: treat every person you encounter, classmates, professors, administrative staff, practicing attorneys, judges, with the same baseline respect regardless of their title. An individual’s reputation is established through each interaction, and the assessment of character and fitness commences upon enrollment rather than at the point of bar application. The legal community is small. People talk. Be the person they talk about for the right reasons.
The second lesson is strategic, and it is one that adult learners are uniquely positioned to execute: know who you are speaking with.
Research your professors. Understand their backgrounds, their practice areas, their judicial clerkships, their published scholarship, their professional philosophies. When you know how a professor thinks, you write better exams because you understand what they value in an analysis. A professor who clerked on a federal appellate court reads a brief differently than a professor who spent twenty years in transactional practice. A professor who publishes on economic analysis of law values policy arguments differently than a professor who teaches from a doctrinal framework. A professor who practiced criminal defense prioritizes different issues than a professor who was a prosecutor.
This is not manipulation. It is preparation. And it is the exact same skill you will use for the rest of your career every time you research a judge before filing a motion, study opposing counsel before a negotiation, or prepare for a pitch to a prospective client. You would never walk into a boardroom without knowing who is sitting on the other side of the table. Do not walk into a classroom without knowing who is standing at the front of it.
The Bottom Line
Law school after thirty-five is not harder than law school at twenty-five. It is different.
You have less time but more discipline. Less flexibility but more focus. Fewer years ahead of you but more experience behind you. Less tolerance for busy work but a sharper sense of what actually matters.
The students who succeed as adult learners are the ones who stop trying to be twenty-five-year-old law students and start being professionals who happen to be in law school. You do not need to pretend you are starting from scratch. You are not. You are bringing two decades of pattern recognition, professional judgment, negotiation experience, and real-world context into an academic environment that desperately needs more of it. That is not a disadvantage. That is a weapon.
My first semester was humbling. My second semester is proving that humility was the prerequisite, not the obstacle. Every lesson on this list is something I learned the hard way, and every one of them is something I wish someone had told me before I started.
So I am telling you.
You already know how to work. Now learn how to learn. The rest follows.
The stairwell is mine. It has always been mine. Undergrad at night. Law school at night. Every floor. Every flight. Nobody took the stairs for me, and nobody can take them from me.
Rick Metzgar is a first-year evening law student at Wilmington University School of Law, a Director of Planned Giving for The Salvation Army in Baltimore, and the creator of @RickLawSchool (Instagram). He is a first-generation college graduate and first-generation law student from Baltimore, Maryland. He writes about law school experience, legal education, and local government accountability.
