The PIP Trap: Why Most Performance Improvement Plans Fail, and How to Write One That Doesn't
About 44 of every 1,000 American workers were on a formal performance procedure in 2023, and most managers still write the plan as the first page of a termination file.
About the author: McKinley Malbrough III, J.D., MS-HRM, is the founder and principal consultant at Urban Human Resources, an Oakland HR and operations consulting firm, and the founder of Online Facilitation Skills.
November 5, 2026
Article and images are AI assisted.
The short answer
A performance improvement plan works only when it is specific enough that the employee knows exactly what success looks like, supported enough that success is possible, and consistent enough that you would write the same plan for anyone else in the same position. A PIP written to build a paper trail fails the employee, and it often fails the employer too. If you are the manager, write the gap, the evidence, the support and the finish line before the first meeting. If you are the employee, ask for those four things in writing.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND PIP DOCUMENTATION SET
Documentation templates that carry a performance concern from the first conversation to the final review, so the plan is specific, fair and consistent. Built for managers and HR teams who want a PIP that gives the employee a real chance and holds up if it does not work.
Why are PIPs everywhere right now?
The number of workers on formal performance procedures has climbed. An HR Acuity study, as reported by LeadDev, found that 43.6 of every 1,000 US workers were subject to a formal performance procedure in 2023, nearly 30% more than in 2020. That is the most recent figure I found, so read it as a 2023 snapshot.
The same reporting points to the pressure behind it. Executives are pushing managers to act on underperformance after the loose accountability years of 2020 to 2022. Some managers reportedly work under PIP quotas, where a set share of staff must be on a plan at any time, often to prepare for a possible reduction in force. Experts quoted in the coverage say a PIP can work when it includes real feedback and support, and that it rarely changes performance when it is only the step before a firing.
Get McKinley Malbrough III’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
That last point is the whole article. The plan is not the problem. The reason it gets written decides whether it works.
What makes a PIP fail?
Four patterns show up again and again.
- The gap is vague: “Needs to improve communication” cannot be met or missed. A plan that cannot be measured cannot be passed.
- The support is missing: the employee gets a list of demands and no coaching, no training and no schedule of check-ins.
- The timing is a tell: a plan that arrives right after a bad review cycle, a complaint or a protected activity looks like retaliation, whatever the intent.
- The outcome is already decided: when the termination paperwork exists before the plan starts, everyone in the room can feel it, including a future investigator or judge.
A fifth failure sits underneath the others. The plan contradicts the record. If the last three reviews said “meets expectations” and the PIP says “chronic underperformance,” the employer has to explain the gap, and the explanation is rarely flattering.
How do you write a PIP that holds up?
Use five parts, in this order.
1. State the gap in observable terms
Name the behavior or result, the standard, and the evidence. “Closed 14 of 30 support tickets within the 48-hour standard last month” works. “Is not responsive” does not. If you cannot point to a document, a metric or a dated example, you are not ready to write the plan.
2. Name the finish line
Say what passing looks like, by when, and how it will be measured. Put the number or the observable behavior in the plan. The employee should be able to check their own progress without asking you.
3. Commit to the support
List what you will provide: training, a mentor, tools, clearer priorities, a lighter load on lower-value work, and the dates of your check-ins. Then keep every date. A manager who skips the check-ins has quietly told the employee how the plan will end.
4. Document every check-in the same day
Write a short note after each meeting: what was reviewed, what improved, what did not, and what happens next. Share it with the employee. Notes written after the fact, or only when things go badly, carry far less weight than notes written as you go.
5. Apply the same standard to everyone
Ask whether you would put a different employee in the same position on the same plan, with the same timeline. If the honest answer is no, fix the plan before anyone signs it. Consistency is what separates a performance process from a pretext. For the legal side of this, including how to read a plan as a setup or a second chance, see Performance Improvement Plan: Setup or Second Chance? and quiet cutting and being pushed out at work.
Each of these five parts needs paper behind it. The Performance Review and PIP Documentation Set gives you that structure so you are not rebuilding it from a blank page each time.
What if you are the one handed a PIP?
You have more options than the first meeting suggests.
- Ask for specifics in writing: which standards, which examples, which dates. If the answers are vague, say so politely and ask again.
- Ask for the support: training, a clearer priority list, a regular check-in. Put the request in an email so there is a record.
- Compare it to your history: pull your last reviews and any positive feedback. A plan that contradicts your own record is worth noting in writing.
- Keep your own log: write down each meeting, what was said and what you delivered, the same day.
- Know your protections: if the plan followed a complaint, a leave request or another protected activity, talk to an employment attorney or your state agency before you sign anything.
A PIP is a serious signal, and you should treat it as one. It is also a process, and you are allowed to ask the process to be fair.
What should you do this week?
If you manage people, pull any PIP you have written or are about to write and check it against the five parts above: observable gap, finish line, committed support, same-day notes, consistent standard. If one is missing, fix it before the plan is delivered. The Performance Review and PIP Documentation Set has the documents for each step.
This is general information, not legal advice.
Sources
- The relentless rise of the PIP, LeadDev, February 2025 (HR Acuity data for 2023; reporting from the Wall Street Journal)
