African Football — The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
African football occupies a fascinating and often contradictory position on the global sporting stage. The continent continues to produce exceptional players who compete at the highest levels of European football, attract international attention, and inspire enormous pride at home. Yet beneath these moments of sporting brilliance lies a more troubling reality: weak governance, inconsistent management, political tensions, security challenges, and the persistent neglect of domestic football structures.
In my analysis of African professional football written in the aftermath of the 2010 African Nations Cup, I presented this contradiction through what I described as the good, the bad, and the ugly sides of the game. My analysis suggests that Africa possesses enormous footballing talent and potential, but organizational dysfunction and poor strategic choices repeatedly prevent that potential from being fully realized.
Sixteen years on, African Football is still embroiled by the observed dysfunction.
Here are some of the takeaways from that article.
The Good — Talent, Attention and Continental Pride
The positive story of African football begins with its players. African stars have established themselves in some of the world’s most competitive leagues, demonstrating the extraordinary depth of talent available across the continent. Their performances have helped place African footballers firmly in the international spotlight.
Major continental tournaments also attract global media attention, international scouts, sponsors, and commercial opportunities. These competitions provide a platform through which emerging talent can be discovered and potentially move into lucrative professional careers abroad.
Beyond economics and individual achievement, football has a powerful emotional and social dimension. When an African national team succeeds, the achievement can transcend club rivalries, ethnic divisions, and national frustrations. Continental victories generate enormous public enthusiasm and a shared sense of identity and pride.
But the same tournaments that showcase Africa’s footballing strengths can also expose some of its deepest structural weaknesses.
The Bad — Management Without Long-Term Strategy
One of the most persistent problems identified in the analysis is the disconnect between footballing ambition and effective management.
African football frequently operates within a financial paradox. Governments may commit enormous sums to hosting major tournaments while significant portions of their populations continue to face severe poverty and limited access to essential public services. Angola’s reported expenditure of approximately US$1 billion on the 2010 African Nations Cup illustrates the scale of this dilemma. At the time, roughly 66.7 percent of the population was described as living on less than US$2 a day.
Get Nnamdi O. Madichie’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The question, therefore, is not simply whether a country should invest in football. Rather, it is whether the resources devoted to sporting mega-events represent the best use of scarce public funds when healthcare, education, infrastructure, and other basic needs remain underdeveloped.
Management practices within football associations present another challenge. Administrative decisions can be highly reactive, with organizations responding to short-term results rather than building sustainable systems.
Coaches are particularly vulnerable to this culture of short-termism. Nigeria’s Shaibu Amodu, for example, was dismissed despite having successfully guided the team to World Cup qualification and a third-place finish in continental competition.
Such decisions create a revolving-door coaching culture in which incoming managers may have little opportunity to establish tactical systems, develop relationships with players, or prepare adequately for major competitions.
The Ugly — When Football Becomes Entangled with Violence and Politics
The darkest side of African football emerged dramatically during the 2010 African Nations Cup.
The attack on the Togolese national team’s bus by rebel forces in Cabinda exposed the serious security risks surrounding major sporting events. The incident transformed what should have been a celebration of football into a tragedy and raised difficult questions about Africa’s capacity to host major international competitions safely.
The subsequent decision by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) to ban Togo after the team withdrew from the tournament following the deadly attack generated further controversy.
From the perspective presented in the analysis, the decision raised an important ethical question — should sporting regulations take precedence when players and officials are confronted with extraordinary security threats?
Football is built around competition, but it is also supposed to embody principles of fair play, unity, and respect for human life. When those principles are subordinated to rigid administrative rules, the sport risks becoming a hostile, “do-or-die” environment rather than a force for solidarity.
The political dimension became equally troubling during the intense rivalry between Egypt and Algeria.
What began as football competition spilled beyond the pitch into diplomatic and commercial relations. Political tensions escalated, while businesses and institutions became caught up in the dispute. The fallout included the targeting and expulsion of the Egyptian telecommunications company Orascom from the Algerian market.
This is perhaps the clearest illustration of football’s extraordinary influence. The sport can bring people together, but when poorly managed passions become intertwined with nationalism and political rivalry, it can just as easily deepen divisions.
