I Used to Let AI Decide What to Write. Later, I Found the Article Didn’t Sound Like Me
This is about how I shifted from “relying on AI to organize information” to “writing real experiences first, then using AI to check structure.”
I remember that night, sitting in front of my computer, rereading an article I had just published.
That article was written with AI assistance. I gave it a topic, let it help me outline the structure, polish sentences, and even fill in some transitions that looked quite complete.
After it was published, I read it myself and felt the logic was smooth and the expression was clean.
But reader response was flat. Not many comments, and no one asked for details.
The Article Was Too “Correct,” But Lacked What Only I Could Write
Later, when I reread that article, I realized the problem wasn’t in the grammar or structure, but that it was too “correct.”
The article had opinions, paragraphs, and summaries, but it lacked what only I could write: where exactly I got stuck at the time, why that problem mattered to me, what I tried, where I went wrong, and how I finally made my judgment.
AI can quickly organize an idea into what looks like a complete article, but it doesn’t know what I’ve actually experienced.
It can write “many people feel lost at the beginning,” but it can’t write about my specific state one late night, staring at error messages, searching repeatedly but still not finding an answer.
The former is a general judgment. The latter is the detail that makes readers believe “this person has actually done this.”
Write the Real Process First, Then Use AI to Check Structure
From then on, I changed how I use it.
I no longer let AI decide what to write, nor let it fabricate experiences or conclusions for me.
I first write down the real process in my own clumsy language: what happened, what I was thinking at the time, where I got stuck, how I judged it later.
Get Forrest Pykes’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
AI can help me check if the structure is clear and if the language is verbose, but the core experiences, judgments, and details must be filled in by myself.
I slowly realized that when I let AI decide what to write, how to organize it, or even fill in experiences first, the article easily becomes “smooth,” but also easily becomes “not like me.”
The parts with real weight are often not those smooth summary sentences, but those experiences and judgments so specific that others can’t easily replace them.
Research First, Then AI — Not AI First, Then Research
Now when I want to write an article, I don’t open AI tools first.
I first ask myself: What have I actually experienced? What detail is something only I could know?
Then I write these down first, even if the language is clumsy and the structure is messy.
After I finish writing the real experiences, I open AI and let it help me check if the structure is clear and if the language is verbose.
This order matters.
If I let AI organize information first, the article will become very “smooth,” but also very “generic.” After reading it, readers won’t feel “this person has actually done this.”
If I write real experiences first, then use AI to check structure, the article may not be as fluent, but it will have details that only I could write.
I still use AI to assist with writing now. Every time I write an article, I still let it help me polish sentences and check structure.
I’m not sure if this method applies to all types of writing. Maybe some fields really do need to let AI organize large amounts of information first.
But at least for me, the shift from “relying on AI to organize information” to “writing real experiences first” has made me more willing to keep real experiences and judgments in my articles, rather than just handing over a logically smooth and cleanly expressed summary.
— -
Looking back now, the problem with that article that got a flat reader response wasn’t in the grammar or structure, but that it lacked what only I could write.
Maybe next time I want to use AI to write an article, I’ll first ask myself: in this article, is there any detail that only I could know?
If not, maybe I should close AI first and write down my real experiences.
