RFC Errata

Errata

Verified (1)

RFC 3939 inline-errata

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata-ID: 208

Status:
Verified
Type:
Editorial
Reported By:
Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported:
2005-01-04

Section says:

No original text provided.

Notes:

Informative Reference includes [RFC2806]; however, [RFC2806] has been obsoleted by [RFC3966].  All citations and references should reflect this throughout the document.

Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 3939 inline-errata

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata-ID: 708

Status:
Held for Document Update
Type:
Editorial
Reported By:
Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported:
2005-01-04
Held for Document Update by:
Peter Saint-Andre

Section 8 says:

according to BCP 90
(= RFC 3864), the new IMAIL Header Fields, "Caller-ID" and
"Caller-Name", as well should get formal IANA registrations listed
in the RFC, using the templates from section 4.2. of RFC 3864 !

It should say:

[none submitted]

Notes:

Perhaps, a citation to BCP 90 would also have been appropriate.

from pending

Errata-ID: 709

Status:
Held for Document Update
Type:
Editorial
Reported By:
Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported:
2005-01-04
Held for Document Update by:
Alexey Melnikov
Date Held for Document Update:
2010-07-24

 

Minor textual improvements:

a) Change the first line of section 6.1., on page 6, from

  "The intent of these headers are to record telephone number that is
   sent by the analog phone system with an incoming call without
   alteration or interpretation." ...

to:

| "The intent of these headers are to record the telephone number that
                                             ^^^
   is sent by the analog phone system with an incoming call without
   alteration or interpretation." ...

b) In the first line of section '10. Acknowledgments', on page 9,
change:

  "The previous authors of versions of this document were Derrick Dunne
   and Jason Collins." ...

to:

| "The authors of previous versions of this document were Derrick Dunne
   and Jason Collins." ...

It should say:

[see above]
Report New Erratum