Percona Server for MongoDB

Pros: Percona is open-source, simple to configure, and stable. I love to using this product, because I don't find trouble or bugs in this product.

Cons: I don't know what cons about this service, because i cant find it.

Overall: With Percona Server for MongoDB I can make my job easier. This product is stable, scalable and secure open-source.

Pros: - Percona distribution of MongoDB.
- Open Source Database Tools.
- Percona Server for MongoDB.
- Percona Kubernetes Operators.

Cons: Nothing as of now. Currently there's nothing I dislike about this product.

Overall: It's was awesome and Open Source Database Tools was great. It was hassle free and setup was a breeze. Every MongoDB user should try this.

Pros: Open Source with great performance offer great flexibility, easy to use, easy integration and user friendly.

Cons: So far have not yet found a big problem while using Percona Server.

Overall: Overall have positive while try Percona Server. First thing to see is the ease of installation administration and developing.

Pros: Free and open source.

Cons: It's a bit slow hangs sometimes other wise it's great, server quality should be improved.

Overall: Amazing experience. Absolutely loved it sometime it crashed but otherwise a great product , well done.

Pros: I liked their logging feature and the flexible data structure which is very easy to use for people who are new to this!

Cons: There is no such major cons that i think but i would say that the documentation should have more practical examples like videos on how to use it.

Overall: Overall my experience with Percona has been great and i would recommend people to use it whoever uses MongoDB at a daily purpose. Great work by the team

Pros: I love using Percona Server for MongoDB because it's easy to use, reliable, scalable, and also completely free.

Cons: - Lack of troubleshooting documentation.
- Not very active community.

Overall: Overall, I recommended using Percona Server for MongoDB because it has the basic feature of MongoDB Server Community Version plus great additional add ons and Enterprise support from Percona.

Pros: We've been running Percona Server for MongoDB for at least 3 years in an AWS environment, its been completely reliable, never had a Percona related issue. Performance has been steady and it enabled us to achieve several auditing requirements without purchasing the Enterprise Edition directly from MongoDB.

Cons: Minor quibbles - we had to write our own utilities to manage log recycling, would've been nice to have that included.

Overall: Positive experience all around, simple to install and run, we hardly ever get alerts of issues on our Percona for MongoDB environment.

Pros: - It's an open-source tool.
- Almost negligible downtime in my case.
- Increased flexibility with native format.

Cons: - Very limited troubleshooting options.
- Not very active community.

Overall: Overall, it's a good product with the very less debugging option, like sometimes it's very hard to know the error and sometimes showing unexpected behavior too.

Pros: Easy to handle, support available, Integration with others possible, Handy as well as compared to the others.

Cons: Not really familiar in the market as per the current trending list.

Overall: I recommend to use it once, I guess you will consider to that for the future in daily work load. Secondly, I you can access their articles also.

Pros: Its Server for MongoDB provides flexible data structure
Great support and community support.
Scalability, and developer-friendly syntax.

Cons: Nothing to cons about, it's a great open source application.

Overall: Percona Server for MongoDB is a free and open source. Many features and benefits of MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise class features from Percona.

Pros: -Ease of install
-Easy replica set setup
-Ease of administration
-Pretty quick support assistance most of the time

Cons: -Limitations for VLDB in respect to acceptable backup runtime
-Limited debug/troubleshooting options
-Still seems a product in infancy

Overall: Overall, it's a good product still growing in features and questionable for critical use cases.
While ease of setup/use/admin is strong points, limitations arise when we hit issues and being unable to figure out root cause or troubleshoot.
In many cases, just have to wait it out so it can resolve on its own. In many cases when db goes into a toss, unable to connect and/or run any commands in the DB.
Log spews out too much information. In a heavy used system doing tons of transactions/statements continuously, its just overwhelming to find something in the log especially when troubleshooting an issue. Maybe if could separate system and non-system (eg DML statements) into separate logs.