<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/</id><updated>2015-07-08T09:25:32.335000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>#16 Considerar formulas mas generales al compilar los safety de Update Controller </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/16/?limit=250#359e" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-07-08T09:25:32.335000Z</published><updated>2015-07-08T09:25:32.335000Z</updated><author><name>Victor Wjugow</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/vwjugow/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net2755decf9566123dda7d19691e5b753ea86d480a</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;commit que soluciona esto: &lt;a href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/code/1124"&gt;https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/code/1124/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>#15 Permitir especificar con maquinas de estado los safety en un controllerSpec para Update Controllers</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/15/?limit=250#5c76" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-07-07T09:17:10.672000Z</published><updated>2015-07-07T09:17:10.672000Z</updated><author><name>Victor Wjugow</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/vwjugow/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net1c3c2f9c9eb175749cbf5d13fb3a2f080bb6d466</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Creo que esto no es posible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lo que hacemos actualmente con las ltl_property que se declaran en safety = {A...}&lt;br /&gt;
es transformalas a las siguientes 2 formulas:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A W stopOldSpec&lt;br /&gt;
y &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class="" href="../startNewSpec%20=&amp;gt;%20[]A"&gt; []A"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Al ser ltl_property, en el codigo puedo hacer def.getLTLFormula() pero si son lts (ProcessSpec) no puedo hacer nada similar. Hay alguna solucion ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>#16 Considerar formulas mas generales al compilar los safety de Update Controller </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/16/?limit=250#21ed" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-07-07T07:07:31.934000Z</published><updated>2015-07-07T07:07:31.934000Z</updated><author><name>Victor Wjugow</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/vwjugow/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd66e24d303c1d36005d328a277eeddca2ea0dd72</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Que otras formulas deberia considerar?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;([]A || []B)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tambien entra en el scope?&lt;br /&gt;
otras mas complejas?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Considerar formulas mas generales al compilar los safety de Update Controller </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/16/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-06-04T12:47:09.205000Z</published><updated>2015-06-04T12:47:09.205000Z</updated><author><name>Victor Wjugow</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/vwjugow/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netb951dd808f119d688f0706304fc69ebd14ac4409</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actualmente solo funciona correctamente para formulas de la forma &lt;br /&gt;
'&lt;a class="" href="..."&gt;&lt;/a&gt;' o simplemente formulas sin '[]'&lt;br /&gt;
Pero si la formula viene escrita de la siguiente forma:&lt;br /&gt;
F = ([]A &amp;amp;&amp;amp; []B &amp;amp;&amp;amp; ..) al transformar esta formula a 'F W stopOldSpec' no se generara controlador.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Permitir especificar con maquinas de estado los safety en un controllerSpec para Update Controllers</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/15/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-06-04T12:42:25.425000Z</published><updated>2015-06-04T12:42:25.425000Z</updated><author><name>Victor Wjugow</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/vwjugow/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netb831637463e9893cbcf03e3e9eed974bc3245400</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;controllerSpec S = {&lt;br /&gt;
    safety = {A, B, C}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actualmente solo funciona si se usan ltl_property, pero A,B,C tambien podrian ser LTS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Codigo en UpdatingControllersGoalsMaker#obtainFormula&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Import Files</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/14/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-03-06T17:40:21.834000Z</published><updated>2015-03-06T17:40:21.834000Z</updated><author><name>Leandro Nahabedian</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/leanaha/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net8b029c055fd2dfe394dbad180bb7ff36b7de5b94</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The tool must import files from others .lts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add support for LTS bisimulation in FSP </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/13/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-02-23T14:22:34.927000Z</published><updated>2015-02-23T14:22:34.927000Z</updated><author><name>Nicolas  D' Ippolito</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/srdipi78/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net0c5bbbfd7a9777f9d62382c058620e25c28bfdba</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Extend FSP to allow for bisimulation check. For example, bisimilar {C1,C2}.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Optimisation that avoid building strategies for loosing games</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/12/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-02-19T16:58:36.031000Z</published><updated>2015-02-19T16:58:36.031000Z</updated><author><name>Nicolas  D' Ippolito</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/srdipi78/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf2898a8a7b0fce7f6f5c288e3ec3d94953fda552</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is an optimisation to be made in every game solver. We could avoid building the strategy when the initial state of the game is not winning for the controller. This feature requires to add the set of initial states to the game structure, and extending the game interface to be able to answer if a game is winning or not. This applies to all game solvers -- e.g. GRGameSolver, ConcurrencyGRGameSolver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>#10 [Refactor] - Parametrize memory type</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/10/?limit=25#93a0" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-01-05T13:46:33.875000Z</published><updated>2015-01-05T13:46:33.875000Z</updated><author><name>Daniel Zacharias</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/danielzacharias/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netdb4e5f9773b1b653c2f416ff2e5cff75fc49480f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Commit revision # 968&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Adapt applyUpdatingController method to Control Problem Class</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mtsa/feature-requests/11/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-01-04T21:43:58.805000Z</published><updated>2015-01-04T21:43:58.805000Z</updated><author><name>Leandro Nahabedian</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/leanaha/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net35077023277325316c1ad0c3558fdaf3870d7e0b</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adapt the applyUpdatingController method in TransitionSystemDispatcher to Control Problem Class&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>