<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent posts to Discussion</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/netmate-meter/discussion/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/netmate-meter/discussion/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/netmate-meter/discussion/</id><updated>2015-03-06T11:52:22.531000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent posts to Discussion</subtitle><entry><title>Bug with module bandwidth</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/netmate-meter/discussion/426992/thread/22c47cb9/" rel="alternate"/><published>2015-03-06T11:52:22.531000Z</published><updated>2015-03-06T11:52:22.531000Z</updated><author><name>Dromard</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/juju1/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.nete80bdd41ce507f2dce97cfc749f769db7f21257c</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you ever experienced bugs with Netmate. Because when I use the bandwidth module of netmate I have quite strange results. Indeed the values of the fields first_time, first_time_us, last_time, last-time_us seem really weird. Here is what I get :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;task: 2, module: bandwidth, tstamp: Mar 02 15:11:47.312114, rows: 2440, columns: 9, colnames: srcip packets bytes first_time first_time_us last_time last_time_us packet_rate bandwidth&lt;br /&gt;
 77.38.4.20, 21569325760567, 4946271860640715678, 27269899005965, 4946271920770259149, 2708132650594331, 115964747528, 10784662880283, 18706270496229839&lt;br /&gt;
77.160.186.145, 627065225218, 4946271907885351058, 2668455742713880, 4946271907885972210, 2668485807484952, 8590555897, 627065225218, 844497944576146&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you can observe in the fisrt line the fisrt_time  27269899005965 (of a packet from the source 77.38.4.20) is superior to the last timz (of a packet from the source 77.38.4.20)  2708132650594331. In the second line it is the contrary  (first time: 2668455742713880, last_time :  2668485807484952). furthermore when I look at the timestamp with wireshark i don't obtain these values at all.&lt;br /&gt;
What do you think of the results I get ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have a nice day&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ps: I don't know if I had to put this message in discussion or bugs, so I put it in both &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>